Chain ranking
Top dApps on Ethereum – Page 27
1,827 projects that run on Ethereum, ranked by DappsAtlas score and total value locked.
- Listed
- 1,827
- Reviewed
- 1,827
- Page
- 27/37
Looking for an overview? Read the Ethereum ecosystem guide.
| Category | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1301 | K2Reviewed | Chain | $4.71M | −0.4% | — |
| 1302 | Zora BridgeReviewed | Canonical Bridge | $4.53M | −1.1% | — |
| 1303 | Mode BridgeReviewed | Canonical Bridge | $4.47M | −1.6% | — |
| 1304 | PoWH3DReviewed | Crypto Gambling | $4.46M | −0.1% | — |
| 1305 | Llama AirforceReviewed | Other | $4.19M | −10.2% | — |
| 1306 | Sorare BridgeReviewed | Canonical Bridge | $3.93M | −0.1% | — |
| 1307 | PirexReviewed | Yield Aggregator | $3.10M | −9.8% | — |
| 1308 | Monolith MarketReviewed | CDPs | $2.72M | +173% | — |
| 1309 | 1secReviewed | Bridge | $2.54M | −3.6% | — |
| 1310 | Sovryn BridgeReviewed | Canonical Bridge | $2.42M | −9.6% | — |
| 1311 | Universe XYZReviewed | Dapp Tools | $2.41M | −0.5% | — |
| 1312 | Ledgity YieldReviewed | Real-World Assets | $2.13M | −9.6% | — |
| 1313 | Blast pre-launch FarmReviewed | Farm | $2.00M | −0.2% | — |
| 1314 | SingularXReviewed | DEXes | $1.92M | +0.1% | — |
| 1315 | AccountableReviewed | Uncollateralized Lending | $1.87M | +70.0% | — |
| 1316 | DeFILReviewed | Lending | $1.76M | −0.0% | — |
| 1317 | The Tokenized BitcoinReviewed | Other | $1.71M | −1.8% | — |
| 1318 | EtherFlipReviewed | Luck Games | $1.69M | +0.1% | — |
| 1319 | CRETH2Reviewed | Staking | $1.53M | +0.1% | — |
| 1320 | Rezerve LendingReviewed | Lending | $1.48M | +0.4% | — |
| 1321 | Interest ProtocolReviewed | CDPs | $1.43M | −3.1% | — |
| 1322 | BendDAO APE StakingReviewed | Staking | $1.42M | −5.2% | — |
| 1323 | TokenStoreReviewed | Services | $1.42M | +0.1% | — |
| 1324 | Peapods FinanceReviewed | Yield Aggregator | $1.34M | −6.9% | — |
| 1325 | LatchReviewed | Yield Aggregator | $1.34M | −0.1% | — |
| 1326 | Switcheo FinanceReviewed | DEXes | $1.17M | −0.3% | — |
| 1327 | Outcome FinanceReviewed | DAO Service Providers | $1.11M | −0.9% | — |
| 1328 | Theo Straddle VaultsReviewed | Basis Trading | $1.03M | +0.0% | — |
| 1329 | Conduit BridgeReviewed | Cross Chain Bridge | $955K | +5.8% | — |
| 1330 | Rari CapitalReviewed | Yield Aggregator | $924K | −6.1% | — |
| 1331 | LazyReviewed | Yield Aggregator | $851K | +0.5% | — |
| 1332 | B.ProtocolReviewed | Liquidations | $831K | −0.8% | — |
| 1333 | BlackwingReviewed | Derivatives | $811K | −1.8% | — |
| 1334 | Convergence FiReviewed | Yield Aggregator | $801K | −8.5% | — |
| 1335 | xTokenReviewed | Liquidity Manager | $767K | −0.2% | — |
| 1336 | DELV YieldReviewed | Yield Aggregator | $715K | −0.2% | — |
| 1337 | Supernova CLReviewed | DEXes | $709K | +1.1% | — |
| 1338 | Trevee EarnReviewed | Yield Aggregator | $602K | −2.2% | — |
| 1339 | Puffer VaultsReviewed | Onchain Capital Allocator | $565K | +0.1% | — |
| 1340 | Opyn SqueethReviewed | Derivatives | $554K | +0.1% | — |
| 1341 | Rezerve MoneyReviewed | Reserve Currency | $546K | −0.8% | — |
| 1342 | Wrap ProtocolReviewed | Synthetics | $528K | −1.2% | — |
| 1343 | yAxisReviewed | Yield Aggregator | $520K | −0.6% | — |
| 1344 | Zero NetworkReviewed | Chain | $516K | +0.1% | — |
| 1345 | Terminal Finance Pre-DepositsReviewed | Farm | $492K | −0.3% | — |
| 1346 | Enosys BridgeReviewed | Cross Chain Bridge | $483K | −2.1% | — |
| 1347 | SingularVReviewed | Risk Curators | $477K | +67.3% | — |
| 1348 | iTrust FinanceReviewed | Insurance | $474K | +2.8% | — |
| 1349 | Bracket VaultsReviewed | Onchain Capital Allocator | $462K | +0.1% | — |
| 1350 | LevelReviewed | Stablecoin Issuer | $458K | −0.0% | — |
Ranked by DappsAtlas score, then total value locked. Click a column to re-sort this page. TVL data via DefiLlama.
What runs here
dApp categories on Ethereum
- 1DEXes1518%
- 2Lending1277%
- 3Yield Aggregator1207%
- 4Centralized Exchanges623%
- 5Cross Chain Bridge613%
- 6Canonical Bridge583%
- 7Onchain Capital Allocator493%
- 8Derivatives483%
- 9Real-World Assets483%
- 10Staking463%
- 11CDPs412%
- 12Risk Curators352%
- 13Bridge342%
- 14Other332%
- 15Crypto Gambling322%
- 16Other322%
- 17GameFi312%
- 18NFT Marketplaces: General292%
Guides
Guides for Ethereum and other chains
Blockchain
Can Ethereum Classic Support dApps? A 2026 EvaluationEthereum Classic can run smart contracts and host dapps, but its path is narrower than Ethereum's. This guide explains the factors that matter, from security and tooling to liquidity, and how to check each one yourself.
Blockchain
Can Ethereum Classic Support dApps? A 2026 ExplainerEthereum Classic can run Solidity smart contracts, so it can host dapps, but its smaller user base, thinner tooling and proof-of-work security trade-offs shape what a builder should expect. This explainer covers how it works, where it fits, and how to check its current state.
Blockchain
Celo as an Ethereum Layer 2: What Changed and What to Know (2026)Celo, once a standalone mobile-focused Layer 1, completed its move to an Ethereum Layer 2 on March 26, 2025. This guide explains what changed, how the network works now, and how to check its current activity.
Blockchain
EIP-1559 and the Ethereum Burn: How It Works in 2026EIP-1559 changed how Ethereum fees work by burning the base fee of every transaction, and the first week after its August 2021 activation showed a burn measured in thousands of ETH, not the 100 million figure some headlines suggest. This guide explains the mechanism, what the early numbers showed, and how to check current burn totals yourself.
Blockchain
Ethereum 2.0 December 1 Launch: What Happened and What It MeansEthereum 2.0 was the name for the plan to move Ethereum from proof of work to proof of stake, and its first live piece, the Beacon Chain, launched on December 1, 2020. This guide explains what that launch was, how it led to The Merge in 2022, and how to check the network's current status.
Blockchain
Ethereum 2.0 Explained: Five Things You Need to Know in 2026Ethereum 2.0 was the name for a multi-year plan to move Ethereum from proof of work to proof of stake. Most of that plan is now live, so the name is mostly historical, but the parts that affect users are still worth understanding.