Lending · Review
InactiveEraLend Review 2026: zkSync Lender Hit by a $3.4M Exploit
EraLend, formerly Nexon Finance, was a lending protocol on zkSync Era that lost $3.4 million in a 2023 exploit. Its TVL is now about $36, so it should be treated as inactive.
By the DappsAtlas editorial team · Updated
DappsAtlas score
2.0/10
Weak
Our verdict on EraLend
2.0/10EraLend was a zkSync Era lending protocol that aimed for capital efficiency and lower oracle dependence. A $3.4 million read-only reentrancy exploit in July 2023 broke that promise, and TVL has since fallen to about $36. It is not a sensible place to lend or borrow today. The page is most useful to people who held positions in 2023 or want a case study of reentrancy risk in lending protocols. Anyone seeking active lending should choose protocols with deep liquidity and a clean record.
Score breakdown
How EraLend scores
- Security
- 1.5/10
- Ease of use
- n/a
- Fees
- n/a
- Features
- 3.5/10
Scores run from 0 to 10 and are based only on facts we could verify. Where information was missing we mark the score n/a rather than guess.
What is EraLend?
EraLend, previously known as Nexon Finance, was a decentralized lending protocol that described itself as a low-risk, capital-efficient money market on zkSync Era. It went live in early 2023 and was at one point described as the largest lending protocol on zkSync.
In July 2023 it suffered a read-only reentrancy attack that cost about $3.4 million. Within days the team said it would stop seeking reconciliation with the attacker. Later reports said some stolen funds were moved to exchanges.
Today the protocol's total value locked is about $36, with no native token. That points to a project that has effectively stopped functioning as a lending market, so this page is mainly a record of what it was and what happened.
How EraLend works
A lending protocol pools assets from suppliers. Suppliers deposit tokens and receive a claim on the pool that earns interest. Borrowers post collateral worth more than they take out, and interest paid by borrowers flows to suppliers.
If a borrower's collateral value falls too far, the position can be liquidated to protect the pool. This depends on accurate price data from oracles and from on-chain markets, which is where EraLend failed. In July 2023 an attacker used a read-only reentrancy flaw to manipulate a value the protocol relied on, and drained about $3.4 million.
EraLend said its design aimed to limit dependence on external liquidity and oracles. The exploit shows that this goal was not fully achieved in practice.
4 features
Key features
01
Money-market lending
Users could supply assets to a pool to earn interest and borrow other assets against their deposits, as in other money-market protocols.
02
Capital-efficiency focus
The project described its design as aimed at capital efficiency while reducing reliance on external liquidity and oracles.
03
zkSync Era deployment
EraLend was deployed on zkSync Era and also lists a Telos deployment, though activity centered on zkSync.
04
Listed audits
Two audits are listed for the project, though the 2023 exploit shows audits do not remove all risk.
Pros and cons
What we like
- Clear purpose as a money-market protocol on zkSync Era
- Two audits are listed for the project
- Design goal of reducing oracle and external liquidity dependency
- Publicly disclosed the incident through its official channels
- No token, so there is no token price exposure
Watch out for
- Lost about $3.4 million in a read-only reentrancy exploit in July 2023
- TVL is now about $36, so the protocol has almost no usable liquidity
- No native token or published incentive program to draw users back
- Fee schedule, team and governance details are not published
- Admitted audits did not prevent the exploit, so audit coverage gave limited protection
EraLend fees
EraLend does not publish a fee schedule in the material available. As with most lending protocols, costs would normally include borrow interest set by pool utilization, a share of interest kept as a reserve, and network gas fees on zkSync Era or Telos.
Users would see the live rates for each asset inside the lending app. Because the protocol holds almost no liquidity today, quoted rates would not reflect a functioning market.
Is EraLend safe?
EraLend suffered a $3.4 million read-only reentrancy exploit in July 2023. That is a direct smart-contract failure, and funds were not fully recovered according to the reports available. Two audits are listed, but the exploit happened regardless, which shows the limits of audits.
The protocol's current TVL is about $36, so there is almost nothing to secure and no sign of active operation. The team, custody arrangements and any regulatory status are not published. Treat any interaction with remaining contracts as high risk.
5 steps
How to get started with EraLend
- 1
Check the project's official social channels first to confirm whether the protocol is still operating or offering withdrawals.
- 2
Do not deposit new funds while TVL is near zero and the 2023 exploit remains unresolved.
- 3
If you used EraLend before July 2023, review your wallet for leftover positions and look for any official recovery announcements.
- 4
Use a revocation tool to remove old token approvals granted to EraLend contracts.
- 5
For active lending on zkSync Era or elsewhere, compare protocols with larger liquidity, public audits and a clean security record.
Who EraLend is for
Mainly former EraLend users checking on old positions, and researchers studying the 2023 zkSync exploit. It is not suited to new depositors or borrowers, given the minimal liquidity and the security history.
EraLend FAQs
What is EraLend?
EraLend was a decentralized lending protocol, previously called Nexon Finance. It let users supply crypto assets to earn interest and borrow against collateral, and it was mainly deployed on zkSync Era.
Was EraLend hacked?
Yes. In July 2023 EraLend was hit by a read-only reentrancy attack that drained about $3.4 million. After the attack the team said it would no longer pursue reconciliation with the attacker.
Is EraLend still active?
It appears to be effectively inactive. Its total value locked is about $36, which means almost no deposits remain. Anyone with funds in old contracts should check the project's official social channels for any recovery or withdrawal instructions.
What is a read-only reentrancy attack?
A read-only reentrancy attack exploits a contract that reads data from another protocol while that protocol is in the middle of a transaction and its state is temporarily inconsistent. The attacker uses the bad value to borrow more than they should. Lending protocols that price collateral from external pools are exposed to this.
Does EraLend have a token?
No. DefiLlama lists no token for EraLend, and the project does not publish a ticker of its own.
Is it safe to deposit into EraLend?
Not through any evidence of current activity. With near-zero TVL and a past exploit, depositing is unattractive. Check the official channels for the project's status before interacting with any contract.
Compare
EraLend alternatives
Aave V3 is a non-custodial DeFi lending protocol on 21 chains where users earn interest on deposits or borrow against collateral.
Venus Core Pool is a multi-chain DeFi money market where users supply crypto to earn interest or borrow against collateral, with about $1.18B in TVL.
Morpho Blue is a permissionless lending primitive with about $11.4 billion in TVL on DefiLlama, accessed mainly through curated vaults.
Dolomite is a multi-chain DeFi money market for lending, borrowing and leveraged strategies across 1,000+ assets, with its own DOLO token.
Compound V3 is a lending protocol on Ethereum and nine other chains where users supply a base asset for yield or borrow it against collateral.
SparkLend is a stablecoin lending market on Ethereum and Gnosis with governance-set rates, backed by Sky's Liquidity Layer, for borrowers and savers.
Same category
More Lending dApps
Euler V2 is a modular DeFi lending protocol for lenders, borrowers and market curators, with about $268M TVL across 16 chains.
Morpho is a decentralized lending protocol with isolated markets, curated vaults and fixed-rate loans for crypto lenders, borrowers and developers.
Kamino Finance is a Solana DeFi protocol offering lending, automated liquidity vaults and leverage tools for users seeking on-chain yield.
Aave V4 is a modular, non-custodial lending protocol using a hub-and-spoke design, for users who want to earn on or borrow against crypto.
Kamino is a Solana DeFi protocol with a lending market, automated concentrated liquidity vaults and an intents-based swap, for yield-seeking on-chain users.
Benqi is an Avalanche DeFi platform offering lending, borrowing, sAVAX liquid staking and low-barrier validator access, governed by the QI token.
Same chain
More on Telos
Uniswap V3 is a non-custodial decentralized exchange protocol for token swaps and concentrated liquidity provision across 40+ chains.
LayerZero V2 is a cross-chain messaging protocol and bridge infrastructure for developers and asset issuers, connecting dozens of blockchains.
vfat.io is a non-custodial, multi-chain yield aggregator and portfolio manager built on the Sickle smart contract wallet, for active DeFi farmers.
SushiSwap is a multichain decentralized exchange with a swap aggregator, perps, staking and liquidity pools for self-custody DeFi traders.
Symbiosis is a cross-chain swap and bridge protocol routing trades across 50+ networks, including Bitcoin, Solana and TON, for DeFi users and developers.
Wan Bridge is Wanchain's cross-chain bridge, linking over 30 networks including Bitcoin, XRPL, Ethereum and Solana, for users moving assets across chains.
How we checked
Sources
Last updated . Spotted an error? Tell us and we will correct it.