Skip to content

DappsAtlas index · 14,224 dApps

DappsAtlas
Listadao logo

CDPs · Review

Active

ListaDAO Review 2026: lisUSD Lending and Liquid Staking

ListaDAO describes a protocol for liquid staking and borrowing lisUSD against crypto assets such as BNB, ETH, slisBNB and wBETH. Its lending concept is clear, but key operating details and the connection between the site’s terms and ListaDAO are not.

By the DappsAtlas editorial team · Updated

DappsAtlas score

5.5/10

Mixed

Our verdict on Listadao

5.5/10

ListaDAO may suit crypto holders looking for a protocol that pairs liquid staking with borrowing against crypto collateral. Its clearest stated use case is borrowing lisUSD against assets such as BNB, ETH, slisBNB and wBETH. The main caveat is the lack of published details on fees, collateral rules and audits, compounded by site terms that refer to Flap.sh and Solana. Verify the app, applicable terms and local rules before connecting a wallet or taking on debt.

Score breakdown

How Listadao scores

Security
n/a
Ease of use
5.0/10
Fees
n/a
Features
6.0/10

Scores run from 0 to 10 and are based only on facts we could verify. Where information was missing we mark the score n/a rather than guess.

What is Listadao?

ListaDAO describes itself as a permissionless liquid-staking and collateralized lending protocol. Its site says users can borrow lisUSD against assets including BNB, ETH, slisBNB and wBETH. Third-party search snippets also associate the project with the LISTA token, but the available site text does not explain its utility.

There are important gaps to check before using it: fees, collateral ratios, liquidation thresholds, supported-chain details and audit information are not established in the product text. The site’s terms also contain references to Flap.sh and Solana that do not clearly match ListaDAO, so verify that the terms presented in the app apply to the service you intend to use.

How Listadao works

ListaDAO presents two related functions: liquid staking and collateralized lending. In a typical liquid-staking arrangement, a user stakes an asset and receives a token representing the staked position. The site describes ListaDAO as offering liquid staking, but the available product text does not specify the staking mechanics, rewards or withdrawal conditions.

For lending, users supply crypto collateral and borrow lisUSD against it. As with other collateralized debt positions, a fall in collateral value can put a position at risk of liquidation. ListaDAO’s site text names BNB, ETH, slisBNB and wBETH as assets for borrowing lisUSD, but does not state collateral ratios, liquidation thresholds or borrowing caps.

4 features

Key features

01

Liquid staking

The site describes a liquid-staking product, though it does not explain the staking process or withdrawal terms.

02

Collateralized borrowing

Users can borrow lisUSD against crypto assets named by the site, including BNB, ETH, slisBNB and wBETH.

03

Permissionless access

The site calls the protocol permissionless. Users still need to check the applicable terms and local legal restrictions.

04

LISTA token

LISTA is named in third-party search snippets about the project. The available site text does not explain its token utility.

Pros and cons

What we like

  • Combines liquid staking and collateralized borrowing in one protocol concept.
  • The site names specific assets users may use to borrow lisUSD.
  • The site describes the protocol as permissionless.

Watch out for

  • The available site text does not clearly establish which blockchain ListaDAO operates on.
  • Borrowing against crypto collateral can lead to liquidation if collateral value falls or loan conditions are breached.
  • Fees, collateral requirements, liquidation thresholds and borrowing limits are not published in the site text.
  • The site’s terms include extensive references to the unrelated Flap.sh protocol and Solana, making it harder to verify which terms apply to ListaDAO.
  • The terms state that the operator is not authorized or regulated by a financial market regulator; no specific financial-services licence is stated.

Listadao fees

Fees are not published in the site’s product text. Check the app’s transaction details before confirming an action, and account for any applicable network fees.

Is Listadao safe?

The site text does not establish whether ListaDAO’s contracts have been audited, and it does not provide audit details. The smart-contract and collateral risks therefore remain difficult to assess; borrowing against volatile assets can expose users to liquidation, while staking introduces additional protocol and withdrawal risks.

The site’s terms say the operator is not authorized or regulated by a financial market regulatory authority and include geographic restrictions, including for people in the United States and other prohibited localities. The terms also refer to Flap.sh and Solana rather than clearly identifying ListaDAO, so their applicability is uncertain. Check the legal terms that apply to the actual service and confirm it is lawful where you live.

5 steps

How to get started with Listadao

  1. 1

    Check whether using the service is legal where you live and read the applicable terms, including any geographic restrictions.

  2. 2

    Visit the official site and confirm that its current app and terms clearly identify ListaDAO and the product you intend to use.

  3. 3

    Review the current supported collateral, borrowing terms, liquidation conditions and transaction costs in the app before proceeding.

  4. 4

    Connect a compatible wallet only if you understand the requested permissions and are comfortable with the risks.

  5. 5

    If you choose to use the protocol, inspect each transaction before signing and monitor any open borrowing position.

Who Listadao is for

ListaDAO is aimed at crypto holders interested in liquid staking or borrowing lisUSD against crypto collateral. It is a poor fit for anyone who needs clearly published fees, liquidation rules, audit information or unambiguous terms before using a protocol.

Listadao FAQs

What is ListaDAO?

ListaDAO describes itself as a liquid-staking and collateralized lending protocol. Its site text says users can use crypto assets including BNB, ETH, slisBNB and wBETH to borrow lisUSD.

What is lisUSD?

The site describes lisUSD as the asset users can borrow against crypto collateral. It does not publish the borrowing limits, collateral ratios or liquidation thresholds in the available product text.

Which assets can I use as collateral on ListaDAO?

The site names BNB, ETH, slisBNB and wBETH as assets that can be used to borrow lisUSD. Check the app for current supported assets and terms before considering a position.

What fees does ListaDAO charge?

The site does not publish a fee schedule in its product text. Review the transaction details in the app before confirming any action; network fees may also apply.

Is ListaDAO regulated, and where can I use it?

The terms say the site operator is not authorized or regulated by a financial market regulatory authority, and the site text includes restrictions for users in the United States and other prohibited localities. Check whether the service is legal where you live and read the applicable terms before using it.

Which blockchain does ListaDAO use?

The site describes ListaDAO as a liquid-staking and lending protocol, but it does not clearly establish its operating chain in the available product text. Its terms contain references to Solana and Flap.sh that do not clearly match ListaDAO.

Compare

Listadao alternatives

All alternatives
crvUSD logo

crvUSD

CDPs

Score 7.4 out of 10

crvUSD is Curve Finance's overcollateralized, USD-pegged CDP stablecoin on Ethereum, minted against crypto collateral by DeFi borrowers.

TVL $112M−13.2%Ethereum
Liquity V2 logoScore 7.8 out of 10

Liquity V2 is an immutable Ethereum borrowing protocol where users set their own interest rate and mint the BOLD stablecoin against ETH, wstETH or rETH.

TVL $86.7M+0.6%Ethereum
Frankencoin logoScore 7.8 out of 10

Frankencoin is an over-collateralized, oracle-free Swiss franc stablecoin (ZCHF) on Ethereum for borrowing, saving and payments.

TVL $59.3M+2.1%Ethereum
Liquity V1 logoScore 7.4 out of 10

Liquity V1 is an immutable Ethereum protocol offering 0% interest LUSD loans against ETH collateral, for DeFi users comfortable with liquidation risk.

TVL $155M−0.8%Ethereum
Indigo logo

Indigo

CDPs

Score 6.5 out of 10

Indigo is a non-custodial synthetic assets protocol on Cardano for minting iUSD and iBTC against collateral, aimed at Cardano DeFi users.

TVL $3.10M−5.5%Cardano
Sky Lending logoNot rated yet

Sky Lending is the borrowing and savings side of the Sky ecosystem on Ethereum, built on the USDS stablecoin, the upgraded version of DAI.

TVL $4.67B−8.4%Ethereum

Same category

More CDPs

CDPs rankings

Sky

CDPs

Score 7.8 out of 10

Sky is the rebranded MakerDAO, a DeFi protocol issuing the USDS and DAI stablecoins, governed by SKY token holders, for DeFi users and stablecoin holders.

Score 7.2 out of 10

Liquity is an Ethereum borrowing protocol where ETH holders mint USD stablecoins (LUSD, BOLD) against their collateral, with the LQTY token for incentives.

Ethereum
Reservoir Protocol logoScore 7.0 out of 10

Reservoir Protocol issues the rUSD stablecoin and yield assets srUSD and trUSD across 17 chains, for DeFi users seeking stable yield.

TVL $69.6M−2.3%Monad · Ethereum · Plasma +14
River Omni-CDP logoScore 6.8 out of 10

River Omni-CDP is a multi-chain CDP protocol that issues the satUSD stablecoin against cross-chain collateral without bridging, for experienced DeFi users.

TVL $74.3M−3.9%BNB Chain · BSquared · Ethereum +9
Felix CDP logoScore 6.8 out of 10

Felix is a Hyperliquid protocol that issues the feUSD stablecoin against collateral, with lending and perps for DeFi traders.

TVL $20.8M−25.7%Hyperliquid L1
BIMA CDP logoScore 6.8 out of 10

Bima is a Bitcoin-backed credit protocol offering fixed-term collar loans and the USBD stablecoin for BTC holders who want liquidity without selling.

TVL $10.3M−3.3%Bitcoin · Ethereum · Hemi +5

How we checked

Sources

No public sources were recorded for this review.

Last updated . Spotted an error? Tell us and we will correct it.