Skip to content

DappsAtlas index · 14,224 dApps

DappsAtlas

Comparison · Updated

UNCX V2 vs V3: Which locker fits your pool? (2026)

V2 is the broader locker by reported TVL and listed network range; V3 is aimed at V3-style liquidity positions. Both offer public locks, vesting tools and the same published ease-of-use score.

Illustration for UNCX V2 vs V3: Which locker fits your pool? (2026)
UNCX Network V2 logo

UNCX Network V2

Token Locker

Score 7.6 out of 10

TVL $135M · 9 chains

UNCX Network V3 logo

UNCX Network V3

Token Locker

Score 7.4 out of 10

TVL $24.9M · 10 chains

Side by side

UNCX Network V2 vs UNCX Network V3 at a glance

UNCX Network V2 and UNCX Network V3 compared
 UNCX Network V2UNCX Network V3
CategoryToken lockerToken locker
Listed chainsEthereum, BNB Chain, Base, Polygon, Arbitrum, Avalanche, Robinhood Chain, Optimism, GnosisEthereum, Base, Robinhood Chain, BNB Chain, Polygon, Arbitrum, Unichain, Hyperliquid, Optimism, Celo
TVLAbout $140.4MAbout $26.8M
TokenUNCXUNCX
FeesVaries by product and configuration; exact amounts not publishedVaries by product and configuration; exact amounts not published
Security and auditsTwo audits listed; scope and findings not summarisedTwo audits listed; scope and findings not summarised
Ease of use7.5/107.5/10
Standout featureLocks V2, V3 and V4 liquidity positions on supported EVM chains, plus some Solana poolsV3-style liquidity locking; wider platform also covers V2, V3 and V4 positions on supported networks
Other toolsToken vesting, staking, farming and token minterToken vesting, staking, farming and token minter
Best forProjects seeking a broader listed network mix and V2, V3 or V4 position locksProjects specifically looking to lock V3-style positions

How UNCX V2 and V3 differ

UNCX Network V2 and V3 share the same core purpose: letting projects lock liquidity positions and publish records that communities can check onchain. V2 is presented as the broader locker, with support for V2, V3 and V4 positions on supported EVM chains, as well as some supported Solana pools. V3 focuses on V3-style positions, though the wider platform also offers other locker types where supported.

Their listed networks differ. V2 includes Avalanche and Gnosis, while V3 includes Unichain, Hyperliquid and Celo; both list Ethereum, BNB Chain, Base, Polygon, Arbitrum, Robinhood Chain and Optimism. Availability depends on the product, pool and network, so a chain appearing in a list does not mean every locker feature works there. V2 reports about $140.4 million in TVL, compared with about $26.8 million for V3. Treat those as version-specific figures, not a substitute for checking compatibility.

Locking and other features

Both versions provide public lock pages showing the position and unlock date, with transactions that can be checked on a block explorer. Each also supports fee collection while liquidity is locked. That lets a project retain LP fee income without making the locked position withdrawable before its chosen date.

V2 is the more natural starting point if you need to lock a V2 or V4 position, or want to check its broader listed chain mix. V3 is the direct fit when your target is a V3-style pool position. The wider UNCX suite on both versions includes vesting schedules with cliffs, linear or stepped releases, plus staking and farming tools. Projects must fund staking and farming rewards themselves; these tools do not create automatic yield. The token minter is optional, and a token does not need to be created with UNCX to use its other products.

Fees and lock duration

Neither version publishes exact service-fee amounts in its homepage details. Both say that fees are separate from network gas and vary according to product and configuration. That means you should not assume V2 and V3 cost the same, or that a single quoted fee applies to every kind of lock or vesting schedule.

Check the applicable fee schedule in the app or documentation before confirming a transaction. You will also need the native token of the chosen network to pay gas for approvals and the lock transaction. Gas costs depend on the network and transaction conditions, and specific amounts are not published here. Since locks cannot be shortened or withdrawn early, review the fee and the lock terms together before you confirm: correcting a mistaken unlock date is not an available option.

Safety and what a lock does not prove

Both versions list two audits and link to audit reports, but their audit details are not summarised. The auditor names, scope and findings are not published in the product details described here, so read the reports themselves and check what contracts and versions they cover. Audits can help identify issues, but they do not remove smart-contract risk.

A lock restricts withdrawal of the specified liquidity position; it does not make the token safe or rule out risks such as token-contract powers. Check the token contract, ownership and allocations separately before treating a lock as a trust signal. Locks cannot be cancelled or shortened early, so confirm the position and unlock date carefully. Staking and farming rewards also depend on the project's own funding and distribution choices. These precautions apply to both V2 and V3.

Which version should you choose?

Choose V2 if you need a locker that explicitly covers V2, V3 or V4 liquidity positions on supported EVM chains, want the option of supported Solana pools, or need a network from its list that V3 does not include, such as Avalanche or Gnosis. Its reported TVL is higher, but that alone does not establish that it is the right locker for your pool.

Choose V3 if you are locking a V3-style position and your required network is on its list. It includes Unichain, Hyperliquid and Celo, which are not in V2's listed networks. The versions have the same ease-of-use score, UNCX token, audit count and broader vesting, staking and farming tools. Before choosing either, confirm that the exact pool and product are supported, review fees and audit scope, and make sure the unlock date is correct.

Verdict: UNCX Network V2 or UNCX Network V3?

Pick UNCX V2 if you need support for V2 or V4 liquidity positions, want its broader listed mix of networks, or are looking at a supported Solana pool. Its reported TVL is also higher, though that is not a measure of fit for your specific pool. Pick V3 if you are locking a V3-style position or need one of its listed networks such as Unichain, Hyperliquid or Celo. Both versions share public lock records, vesting and reward tools, and neither publishes exact service fees. Confirm product availability and lock terms before committing.

Frequently asked questions

Which has more TVL?

V2 lists about $140.4 million in TVL, while V3 lists about $26.8 million. These figures describe the separate versions and do not by themselves establish which one fits a particular pool or project.

Which chains do V2 and V3 list?

V2 lists Ethereum, BNB Chain, Base, Polygon, Arbitrum, Avalanche, Robinhood Chain, Optimism and Gnosis. V3 lists Ethereum, Base, Robinhood Chain, BNB Chain, Polygon, Arbitrum, Unichain, Hyperliquid, Optimism and Celo.

Are V2 or V3 cheaper?

Neither publishes specific service-fee amounts in the homepage details. Fees vary by product and configuration, and network gas is separate, so check the current fee schedule before creating a lock.

Do the audits or locks guarantee safety?

Both list two audits, but the audit scope and findings are not summarised. A liquidity lock restricts withdrawal of the locked position; it does not guarantee that the token itself is safe.