Comparison · Updated
Pact vs Turbos: Algorand tools or Sui liquidity? (2026)
Pact suits Algorand users who want an aggregator and several pool types; Turbos is the Sui-only option centered on concentrated liquidity. Both have modest TVL, and exact fees are not published.
Side by side
Pact vs Turbos at a glance
| Pact | Turbos | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | DEX / automated market maker | DEX / concentrated-liquidity exchange |
| Chain | Algorand | Sui |
| TVL | $902,348 | $3,042,167 |
| Token | POW | TURBOS |
| Fees | Exact swap and pool fees not published | Fees not published |
| Security / audits | Two audits listed; auditors and findings not named | No audits listed |
| Ease of use | Ease-of-use score: 7 | Ease-of-use score: 7 |
| Standout features | Swap aggregator, multiple pool types, farms, analytics | Concentrated-liquidity pools; Sui-native trading |
| Best for | Algorand users seeking routed swaps and pool choices | Sui users seeking concentrated liquidity |
| Pool approach | Concentrated-liquidity pools are described as testing | Concentrated liquidity is a core feature |
## How Pact and Turbos differ
Pact and Turbos serve different ecosystems, so the first choice is usually your chain. Pact operates on Algorand and combines an automated market maker with a swap aggregator that can route trades across Algorand DEXs, including competitors. Turbos is built for Sui and focuses on concentrated-liquidity trading. Neither gives users access to the other’s chain through the features described here.
Pact has the broader set of listed tools: traditional AMM and stable-swap pools, farms, analytics, portfolio tracking, and a developer SDK. Its concentrated-liquidity pools are described as testing, rather than an established feature. Turbos has a narrower focus, with concentrated liquidity, liquidity and staking options, and a stated focus on low-cap Sui tokens. That focus can bring higher token risk.
## Liquidity and pool choices
Pact reports TVL of about $902,000, while Turbos reports about $3.0 million. Both figures are modest for a DEX, and aggregate TVL alone cannot tell you how much liquidity is available for a particular trading pair or trade size. Larger swaps may face noticeable price impact or slippage, especially in thinner pools, so check the specific pool before trading.
Pact offers traditional AMM, stable-swap, and concentrated-liquidity pool types, with multiple fee tiers. That range gives liquidity providers more ways to match a pool to an asset pair, though Pact’s concentrated-liquidity feature is still described as testing. Turbos makes concentrated liquidity central: providers can focus capital within selected price ranges. This can improve capital efficiency, but it also requires managing positions and price ranges. Neither design removes the risk of impermanent loss for liquidity providers.
## Fees and network costs
Neither platform publishes exact trading fees in the details here. Pact says pools have multiple fee tiers, but the actual percentages and any aggregator or protocol take rate are not stated. Turbos’ fee levels are also not published. Check the pool fee tier, quoted trade amount, and estimated price impact in the app before confirming a swap or adding liquidity.
Network costs differ because the platforms run on different chains: Pact users pay Algorand transaction fees, and Turbos users pay Sui gas. Those network charges are separate from a pool’s trading fee. Public sources do not give exact amounts for either chain, so do not assume one platform will be cheaper for a specific transaction. Compare the transaction quote shown for your own trade before proceeding.
## Safety and risks
Pact has two audits listed, but the auditors and audit findings are not named. Turbos has no audits listed, leaving audit assurance unclear. An audit listing is not a guarantee that a protocol is free of bugs, and both platforms carry smart-contract risk. Pact and Turbos are described as non-custodial in relevant ways: Pact users connect their own wallet, and Turbos says trades happen from the user’s wallet without the platform holding funds. Non-custodial use does not remove the risk of a contract interaction.
Liquidity providers on either DEX can face impermanent loss. Turbos’ low-cap token focus adds risks such as thin liquidity, sharp price moves, and scams. No hacks or incidents, or regulatory status, are listed for either project. Use only the official project interface, verify token and pool details, and avoid depositing money you cannot afford to lose.
## Which DEX should you choose?
Choose Pact if you already use Algorand and want swap routing across its DEX ecosystem, several pool styles, or farms and portfolio tools in one interface. Its aggregator is a notable fit for users comparing execution across Algorand venues. Keep in mind that its TVL is modest and its concentrated-liquidity pools are still described as testing.
Choose Turbos if you use Sui and want a DEX built around concentrated liquidity, or if you are comfortable researching newer, lower-cap tokens. Its reported TVL is higher than Pact’s, but it remains modest and does not guarantee depth for a particular pair. Both platforms have an ease-of-use score of 7, so the chain and the features you need are stronger differentiators than that score. For either choice, review fees and price impact before trading.
Verdict: Pact or Turbos?
Choose Pact if you trade on Algorand and value an aggregator that routes across DEXs, multiple pool types, farms, and built-in analytics. Its two listed audits offer more audit visibility than Turbos, although the auditors and findings are not named. Choose Turbos if you are on Sui and want concentrated liquidity as the central pool model. Turbos has the higher reported TVL, but both platforms are modest in size, so check depth and price impact for your specific trade. Fees are not published for either.
Frequently asked questions
Which DEX has lower fees?
Pact's exact swap fees and pool fee percentages are not published. Turbos' fee levels are also not published; check the fee tier and estimated price impact in the app before confirming.
What chains do Pact and Turbos support?
Pact runs on Algorand, while Turbos runs on Sui. Neither is described as a multi-chain DEX for users trading across those networks.
Which platform has audits?
Two audits are listed for Pact, but the auditors and findings are not named. No audits are listed for Turbos, so its audit status is unclear.
Who should use Pact, and who should use Turbos?
Choose Pact for Algorand swaps, cross-DEX routing, and a choice of pool types and farms. Choose Turbos if you use Sui and specifically want concentrated-liquidity pools or access to its low-cap token focus.