Comparison · Updated
DaVinciGraph vs UNCX Network V2: Which locker fits? (2026)
DaVinciGraph is a Hedera-focused token management suite; UNCX Network V2 offers lockers and vesting across multiple chains. Choose based on your network and whether you need broader project tools or cross-chain locking.

DaVinciGraph
Token Locker
TVL $1.85M · 1 chains
UNCX Network V2
Token Locker
TVL $135M · 9 chains
Side by side
DaVinciGraph vs UNCX Network V2 at a glance
| DaVinciGraph | UNCX Network V2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Token locker and Hedera token management suite | Token locker, vesting and staking tools |
| Chains listed | Hedera | Ethereum, BNB Chain, Base, Polygon, Arbitrum, Avalanche, Robinhood Chain, Optimism and Gnosis |
| TVL | About $1.85 million | About $140 million |
| Token | DAVINCI | UNCX |
| Fees | Not published | Varies by product and configuration; specific amounts are not published |
| Audits | No audits listed | Two audits listed; scope and findings are not detailed here |
| Standout features | Token, NFT and LP locking; vesting; token management; burning; snapshots; logo service | Liquidity locking, vesting, staking and farming, and token minting |
| Network fit | Focused on Hedera; not suitable for assets on other chains | Multi-chain coverage, with product and network availability varying |
| Transparency | Public dashboards for locks, vesting and burns | Shareable lock and vesting records with transactions checkable on block explorers |
| Best for | Teams that need several token lifecycle tools on Hedera | Projects that need liquidity locks or vesting across supported chains |
How DaVinciGraph and UNCX differ
The main difference is scope. DaVinciGraph combines locking with Hedera-specific token management, snapshots, a logo service and APIs. Its tools cover token and NFT locks, LP locks, vesting, burning and token actions such as minting, freezing and pausing. That breadth is useful if your project operates on Hedera and needs more than a lock.
UNCX Network V2 is more focused on lockers, vesting and staking-related products, but it is listed across nine chains. Its liquidity lockers cover V2, V3 and V4 positions on supported EVM chains, and its vesting tools offer cliff, linear and stepped releases. Product availability can vary by network, and supported Solana pools are also mentioned for liquidity locking. In short, DaVinciGraph offers a broader Hedera toolkit; UNCX is the more suitable starting point for multi-chain lock and vesting needs.
Fees and transaction costs
Neither platform publishes exact service charges in the information here. DaVinciGraph does not state costs for locking, vesting, burning, token creation or snapshots. UNCX says its service fees vary by product and configuration, and that fees are separate from network gas. Users should check the applicable fee schedule and the transaction details before confirming.
Gas is an additional consideration for UNCX: its fee guidance says users need the network's native token to pay it. DaVinciGraph's available fee details advise checking the charge shown in the app or Hedera wallet at confirmation. Do not assume that a service is free because a specific price is not stated publicly. Compare the final service charge and network cost for the exact action you plan to take, and confirm the lock terms before committing assets.
Audits and safety
DaVinciGraph has no audits listed, and its project materials do not describe an independent security assessment. Its locker contracts hold assets, so a contract flaw or an admin function that affects locked funds is a risk to consider. The team, governance and past incidents are not stated publicly.
UNCX has two audits listed, but the auditors, audit scope and findings are not detailed here. An audit does not remove smart-contract risk. UNCX also cautions that locking a liquidity position does not establish that the token itself is safe. Assess the token contract and project commitments separately. For either service, check the contract and the unlock conditions before using it, and avoid treating a public lock as proof that a project is trustworthy.
Features and transparency
DaVinciGraph's differentiator is its set of Hedera tools beyond locking. It offers token and NFT locks, vesting schedules, a described immutable blackhole burner, token-management actions, network snapshots and a logo service. Public dashboards show active locks and locked value, and APIs are listed for its locker and logo service. Some other planned products, including a launchpad and airdrop system, are marked as coming soon, so they should not be treated as current features.
UNCX emphasizes verifiable commitments. Lock and vesting records have shareable pages, with underlying transactions checkable on a block explorer. Its lock products can allow projects to collect LP fees while positions are locked. Vesting can be structured with cliffs, linear releases or stepped releases, while staking and farming pools require projects to fund rewards. These features suit different needs: ecosystem management on Hedera versus locks and schedules that communities can inspect across supported networks.
Which one should you choose?
Choose DaVinciGraph if your assets and project are on Hedera and you want token operations, snapshots or logo management alongside locking and vesting. Its TVL is about $1.85 million, and the platform's single-chain focus means it is not an option for assets on other networks. The lack of listed audits is a significant reason to examine contracts carefully before locking funds.
Choose UNCX Network V2 if you need liquidity locks or vesting on one of its listed networks, or want tools for staking and farming. Its TVL is about $140 million, and two audits are listed, though you should still review their reports and check product support for your specific pool. Locks cannot be shortened or withdrawn early, so choose an unlock date carefully. For either platform, a lock is not a substitute for assessing the token and its team.
Verdict: DaVinciGraph or UNCX Network V2?
Pick DaVinciGraph if you work on Hedera and want a single suite for locks, vesting, token operations, snapshots and logo management. Its Hedera focus is useful, but it has no audits listed and its fees are not published. Pick UNCX Network V2 if you need liquidity locking or vesting across its supported networks, or want staking and farming tools. It has two audits listed and substantially more TVL, but fees vary and lock terms cannot be shortened or reversed. With either choice, verify the specific contract, token and transaction details before committing assets.
Frequently asked questions
Which platform has more listed audits?
DaVinciGraph has no audits listed. UNCX Network V2 has two audits listed, but the auditors, scope and findings are not detailed here; check the reports before relying on them.
Which chains do they support?
DaVinciGraph is listed on Hedera. UNCX Network V2 is listed on Ethereum, BNB Chain, Base, Polygon, Arbitrum, Avalanche, Robinhood Chain, Optimism and Gnosis; some products may have narrower availability.
How much do their services cost?
Neither publishes specific fees in the information here. UNCX says its service fees vary by product and configuration, while DaVinciGraph's costs for its listed tools are not published.
Does a liquidity lock prove a token is safe?
No. UNCX says locking restricts withdrawal of the locked position but does not guarantee that the token itself is safe. Check the token contract and other project commitments as well.