Comparison · Updated
DaVinciGraph vs Team Finance: Which locker fits? (2026)
DaVinciGraph is the Hedera-focused choice for teams that want token management and snapshots alongside locks. Team Finance suits projects that need a broader, multi-chain toolkit and has two audits listed.

DaVinciGraph
Token Locker
TVL $1.85M · 1 chains
Team Finance
Token Locker
TVL $56.6M · 21 chains
Side by side
DaVinciGraph vs Team Finance at a glance
| DaVinciGraph | Team Finance | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Token locker and Hedera token-management suite | Non-custodial token-project toolkit |
| Chains | Hedera only | 21 chains listed; tool support varies by chain |
| TVL | About $1.85 million | About $60.96 million |
| Token | DAVINCI | SWAP |
| Fees | Not published | Not published; network gas fees also apply |
| Security and audits | No audits listed | Two audits listed; details not given |
| Ease of use | Ease score: 7 | Ease score: 8 |
| Standout features | Token, NFT and LP locks, vesting, burning, token management and snapshots | Locks, vesting, token creation, staking, airdrops, payroll and multisender |
| Best for | Hedera projects needing token controls and snapshot tools | Projects seeking a broad toolkit across multiple chains |
| Status | Active | Active |
How DaVinciGraph and Team Finance differ
DaVinciGraph is built specifically for Hedera. Alongside token, NFT and LP locks, it offers token vesting, a permanent blackhole burner, token management and network snapshots for planning airdrops or token sales. It also has a logo service and APIs for its locker and logo tools. That combination makes it relevant to teams handling several parts of a Hedera token’s lifecycle.
Team Finance covers more chains and a wider set of project operations. Its toolkit includes locks for liquidity, team tokens and NFTs, plus vesting, token creation, staking pools, airdrops, payroll and multisender tools. MintPlus combines token creation, Uniswap V3 liquidity setup and locking in one flow. Its feature support varies by chain, so check that the specific tool you need is available where your assets are.
Fees and transaction costs
Neither platform publishes specific fees for its services. DaVinciGraph does not state costs for locking, vesting, burning, token creation or snapshots. Team Finance points users to a pricing page, but the fee amounts are not stated here. It describes token minting and its tokenomics tool as free to start, and offers a free testnet option.
Fees are only part of the transaction cost. Team Finance notes that network gas fees apply, and transactions on either platform may involve chain costs. Before committing, check the service’s current pricing and the transaction details shown in your wallet. For a lock or vesting schedule, confirm the total charge and terms before signing; don’t assume that two tools with similar names or functions cost the same.
Security and audit coverage
Team Finance has two audits listed, but the audit reports, scope and dates are not given here. It describes its lock contracts as non-custodial, meaning the site says it cannot access tokens held in them. DaVinciGraph has no audits listed, and the project does not describe an independent security assessment. Its blackhole contract is described as immutable and irreversible, but that does not establish the safety of its other contracts.
Both platforms involve smart-contract risk, wallet-approval risk and user error. A lock does not verify the quality of the project or token being locked, and a flaw in a contract could still put assets at risk. Review the contract and relevant audit documents where available, understand the unlock conditions, and avoid locking significant value until you are comfortable with the risks.
Which platform should you choose?
Choose DaVinciGraph if your work is on Hedera and you want more than a basic locker. Its token manager covers actions such as minting, burning, freezing, pausing and KYC controls, while snapshots can help teams filter accounts for distribution planning. Its main limitation is also clear: assets on other chains are outside its scope. Fees are not published, and no audits are listed.
Choose Team Finance if you need a broader set of project tools or work across multiple chains. It offers staking, airdrops, payroll and token creation in addition to locks and vesting, and two audits are listed. Still, chain support varies by feature, fees are not published, and the audit details are not given here. Check the relevant chain, tool and contract before using it.
Verdict: DaVinciGraph or Team Finance?
Pick DaVinciGraph if your project is Hedera-only and you value its wider Hedera token controls, snapshot service and permanent burner alongside locking. Its TVL is lower, and it has no audits listed, so scrutinize the contracts and lock terms. Choose Team Finance if you need tools across multiple chains, or want staking, payroll, airdrops and token creation in the same toolkit. It has substantially higher listed TVL and two audits listed, though audit details and service fees are not published here. In either case, verify chain support and transaction costs before signing.
Frequently asked questions
Which has more TVL?
Team Finance has the higher listed TVL, at about $60.96 million compared with DaVinciGraph’s about $1.85 million. TVL is not a guarantee of contract safety or the quality of a project’s token.
Which supports more chains?
DaVinciGraph supports Hedera only. Team Finance lists support across many chains, including Ethereum, BNB Chain, Base, Avalanche, Polygon and Arbitrum, though its tools are not all available on every chain.
Are either platform’s fees published?
Neither publishes specific service fees. Team Finance says gas fees also apply, and its token minting and tokenomics tool are free to start; check the app and wallet transaction details before confirming.
Which has stronger published audit coverage?
Team Finance has two audits listed, but audit details are not given here. DaVinciGraph has no audits listed. Both still carry smart-contract and user-error risks, so check contract and audit details before locking significant value.