Skip to content

DappsAtlas index · 14,224 dApps

DappsAtlas
IFPool logo

Staking · Review

IFPool Review 2026: CET Liquid Staking

IFPool is described as a liquid-staking pool where users stake CET to receive iCET for use in other DeFi protocols. Key details about fees, unstaking and the pool’s current operation are not published.

By the DappsAtlas editorial team · Updated

DappsAtlas score

—/10

Not rated

Our verdict on IFPool

IFPool’s stated purpose is straightforward: stake CET, receive iCET, and potentially use that token in other DeFi protocols. That may suit CET holders seeking a liquid-staking position, but the pool’s practical usefulness depends on iCET support and the ability to redeem it. Fees, unstaking terms, the current interface and audit details are not published. Verify those points and the pool’s operating status before depositing; public sources are not enough to assess its security or day-to-day usability.

Score breakdown

How IFPool scores

Security
n/a
Ease of use
n/a
Fees
n/a
Features
n/a

Scores run from 0 to 10 and are based only on facts we could verify. Where information was missing we mark the score n/a rather than guess.

What is IFPool?

IFPool is described as a liquid-staking pool for CET. Users receive iCET after staking, and the token is intended for use in other DeFi protocols. The pool’s current interface, supported protocols, fees and unstaking terms are not published.

How IFPool works

IFPool is described as a liquid-staking pool: users stake CET and receive iCET in return. The iCET token is intended to represent their staked position while allowing use in other DeFi protocols.

The pool’s exchange rate, reward calculation, redemption process and unstaking conditions are not published. Those details affect how much value a holder can recover and how easily iCET can be used or exchanged.

2 features

Key features

01

CET liquid staking

Users stake CET and receive iCET, according to the project description.

02

DeFi token use

iCET is described as usable in other DeFi protocols. Which protocols currently support it is not specified.

Pros and cons

What we like

  • The stated mechanism gives CET stakers an iCET token for potential use in DeFi.
  • The project is specifically described as a liquid-staking pool rather than a general-purpose staking service.
  • Two audits are listed, although their details are not published.

Watch out for

  • The pool’s current interface and instructions are not documented here.
  • Fees, exchange rates and any unstaking wait period are not published.
  • The iCET token may depend on other DeFi protocols for its use and liquidity.
  • The two listed audits have no published names, scope or findings here.

IFPool fees

IFPool’s fees are not published. Check the pool interface and contract details for any staking, redemption or other charges before using it.

Is IFPool safe?

Two audits are listed, but their names, scope and findings are not published. An audit listing does not establish that the pool is free of vulnerabilities. Public sources do not explain custody arrangements, contract controls, redemption protections or the team behind the pool. Liquid-staking users also face smart-contract, token-liquidity and redemption risks.

4 steps

How to get started with IFPool

  1. 1

    Confirm that IFPool is currently operating and that you have access to its official interface.

  2. 2

    Review the pool’s contract details, fees and unstaking terms before committing CET.

  3. 3

    Connect a compatible wallet and stake CET only if the interface and transaction details match your expectations.

  4. 4

    Check that the wallet received iCET and verify the intended protocol supports it before using it elsewhere.

Who IFPool is for

IFPool may interest CET holders who want a token representing a staked position for possible use in DeFi. It is a poor fit for anyone who needs clear fee, redemption or audit information before committing funds.

IFPool FAQs

What is IFPool?

IFPool is described as a liquid-staking pool for CET. It issues iCET, which is intended for use in other DeFi protocols.

What are IFPool’s fees and unstaking terms?

The pool’s fee schedule, unstaking terms and iCET redemption process are not published. Check the pool interface and relevant contract details before staking.

Is IFPool audited and safe to use?

Two audits are listed, but their names, scope and findings are not published. Smart-contract and liquid-staking risks remain, and users should verify the pool’s current status before depositing.

Compare

IFPool alternatives

All alternatives
SSV Network logoScore 7.6 out of 10

SSV Network is a distributed validator technology layer for Ethereum staking, used by exchanges, custodians, staking services and node operators.

TVL $11.7B+0.1%Ethereum
Obol logo

Obol

Staking

Score 7.2 out of 10

Obol builds Distributed Validator technology that splits Ethereum validators across operator clusters, for stakers, operators and institutions.

TVL $1.27B+19.5%Ethereum
Babylon Protocol logoScore 7.4 out of 10

Babylon is a Bitcoin collateral infrastructure project that lets holders stake native BTC or use it as collateral without wrapping or bridging.

TVL $3.10B−1.8%Bitcoin
Jito Liquid Staking logoScore 8.0 out of 10

Jito Liquid Staking lets Solana users stake SOL for JitoSOL, a liquid token that accrues staking and MEV rewards.

TVL $928M−7.6%Solana
ether.fi Stake logoScore 7.8 out of 10

ether.fi Stake is a non-custodial Ethereum liquid staking protocol with an app for earning, borrowing and spending, for ETH holders comfortable with DeFi risk.

TVL $4.26B−0.8%Ethereum · Base · Arbitrum +3
Liquid Collective logoScore 7.6 out of 10

Liquid Collective is a non-custodial Ethereum liquid staking protocol issuing LsETH, designed mainly for institutions and compliance-focused stakers.

TVL $616M+0.1%Ethereum

Same category

More Staking dApps

Staking rankings
Marinade Liquid Staking logoScore 8.0 out of 10

Marinade is a Solana staking protocol offering native and liquid staking (mSOL) via an auction where validators bid for delegated SOL.

TVL $204M−6.8%Solana
Kinetiq kHYPE logoScore 7.8 out of 10

Kinetiq is a non-custodial liquid staking protocol on Hyperliquid that turns staked HYPE into the yield-bearing kHYPE token for DeFi users.

TVL $831M−11.5%Hyperliquid L1
BlazeStake logo

BlazeStake

Staking

Score 7.8 out of 10

BlazeStake is a non-custodial Solana liquid staking protocol that issues bSOL, for SOL holders wanting staking yield and DeFi use.

TVL $78.9M−6.8%Solana
Ankr logo

Ankr

Staking

Score 7.6 out of 10

Ankr is a Web3 infrastructure provider offering multichain RPC, rollup services and liquid staking for stakers, developers and enterprises.

TVL $23.9M−2.1%Ethereum · Flow · BNB Chain +5
Sanctum Validator LSTs logoScore 7.4 out of 10

Sanctum Validator LSTs are Solana liquid staking tokens from SanctumSPL stake pools, for SOL holders and teams launching custom LSTs.

TVL $1.60B−5.6%Solana
mETH Protocol logoScore 7.4 out of 10

mETH Protocol is a non-custodial ETH liquid staking protocol on Ethereum, governed by Mantle, for ETH holders who want yield and a liquid receipt token.

TVL $524M−1.0%Ethereum

How we checked

Sources

  1. 1.defillama.com/protocol/ifpool

Last updated . Spotted an error? Tell us and we will correct it.