Comparison · Updated
GTBTC vs SolvBTC LSTs: custody or DeFi flexibility? (2026)
GTBTC is the simpler, exchange-custodied BTC receipt. SolvBTC LSTs offer more liquid DeFi uses and supported chains, but rely on custodians and project-run backing reports.

SolvBTC LSTs
Restaked Btc
TVL $71.8M · 2 chains
Side by side
GTBTC vs SolvBTC LSTs at a glance
| GTBTC | SolvBTC LSTs | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Restaked BTC receipt token | Liquid Bitcoin staking tokens |
| Chains | Bitcoin | Ethereum, Bitcoin |
| TVL | About $277.6 million | About $76.0 million |
| Token | GTBTC; 1:1 receipt for BTC staked through Gate | Includes xSolvBTC and SolvBTC.CORE; no single token listed |
| Fees | Not published | Not published |
| Security and audits | No audits listed; exchange custody risk | Audits are not detailed publicly; custodian, smart-contract and strategy risks |
| Ease of use | Ease-of-use score: 7.5/10 | Ease-of-use score: 6.5/10 |
| Standout feature | Gate's internal staking and earn system | Liquid tokens for trading, lending and liquidity pools |
| Best for | Users who want a simple BTC receipt within Gate | Users seeking liquid BTC tokens for DeFi across two chains |
| Redemption | Redeemable to BTC at any time, according to its product description; terms are not published | xSolvBTC is pitched with instant redemption; current terms are not published |
How GTBTC and SolvBTC LSTs differ
GTBTC is a 1:1 receipt token for BTC staked through Gate. Its yield comes from Gate's internal staking and earn system, and the product sits within the Gate exchange. That makes it a relatively direct choice if you already want to use Gate and prefer a single exchange-based position.
SolvBTC LSTs are a group of tokens, including xSolvBTC and SolvBTC.CORE. Solv describes SolvBTC as tokenized BTC and xSolvBTC as a yield-bearing token that can be used in lending, liquidity pools and other DeFi apps. Solv lists the products on Ethereum and Bitcoin, while GTBTC is listed on Bitcoin only. Solv has the broader set of described uses; GTBTC has the simpler receipt-token structure.
Custody, transparency and safety
Both options rely on custodians, so neither gives you purely on-chain exposure to BTC. GTBTC is held on Gate's platform, making exchange solvency, operational failures, account security and regulatory action central risks. Gate says it publishes 100% Proof of Reserves and keeps user funds in full cold storage; those are company claims, not a substitute for assessing custody risk. The product has no standalone token governance and depends on Gate's policies.
Solv also relies on custodians and off-chain backing, and adds smart-contract and strategy risks. The project claims real-time allocation information, weekly reserve proofs and monthly custodian attestations. Audit reports are linked by the project, but their details are not published here. Solv also says it is not regulated by a federal or state agency and does not offer services to U.S. persons. Consider which custody and operational risks you are willing to accept.
Fees, yield and redemption
Fees and yield rates are not published for either product. For GTBTC, the staking and redemption costs, rate of yield and any spread retained by Gate are not stated publicly; check the Gate app or product page for current terms. Do not assume that zero-fee offers on other Gate products apply to GTBTC.
Solv does not publish a fee schedule for minting, redeeming or holding its LSTs, nor does it state a yield rate or protocol cut. Users may also incur network gas on the chain they use and fees from integrated venues. GTBTC is described as redeemable for BTC at any time, but its actual terms are not published. Solv pitches instant redemption for xSolvBTC, but that should not be treated as a full statement of current redemption conditions. Verify the terms before committing BTC.
Which one should you choose?
Choose GTBTC if you want a straightforward 1:1 BTC receipt inside Gate and are comfortable with exchange custody. Its reported TVL is about $277.6 million, and the product description says it can be redeemed to BTC at any time. The trade-off is dependence on Gate, an undisclosed yield breakdown, and unpublished fees and redemption terms.
Choose SolvBTC LSTs if you value liquid token uses in DeFi or want access on both Ethereum and Bitcoin. Solv describes a wider set of integrations and product types, but xSolvBTC's yield sources and strategy risks are not laid out publicly. Its reported listing TVL is about $76.0 million. In either case, do not choose on TVL alone: review custody, redemption conditions, fees and your eligibility before using the product.
Verdict: GTBTC or SolvBTC LSTs?
Pick GTBTC if you want a simple 1:1 BTC receipt within Gate and accept exchange custody and dependence on Gate's internal earn system. Its reported TVL is higher, but fees, yield and redemption terms are not published. Pick SolvBTC LSTs if DeFi utility, liquid token uses and access on Ethereum as well as Bitcoin matter more. Solv describes more integrations and product options, but its tokens carry custodian, smart-contract and strategy risks, and yield details remain unclear. Neither is a clear fit if you require fully on-chain custody or published fees and yield terms.
Frequently asked questions
Can I redeem either token for BTC?
GTBTC is described as redeemable for BTC at any time, but its redemption terms and any costs are not published. xSolvBTC is pitched with instant redemption; check Solv's current terms before relying on that feature.
What fees and yields should I expect?
Neither product publishes a fee schedule or yield rate. Check the relevant app for current minting, redemption and staking terms; Solv users may also pay network gas and fees charged by integrated venues.
Which chains do they support?
GTBTC is listed on Bitcoin. SolvBTC LSTs are listed on Ethereum and Bitcoin, and Solv describes uses across lending, liquidity pools and other DeFi apps.
Which option is safer?
Neither is risk-free. GTBTC has exchange custody and counterparty risk; SolvBTC LSTs add custodian, smart-contract and strategy risks, and either token may be affected by operational or redemption issues.