GoPlus Locker V3 vs UNCX Network V3: which fits? (2026)

Both platforms let projects make lock commitments visible on-chain, but their main use cases differ. GoPlus Locker V3 locks tokens and liquidity with time-based conditions, target-price conditions, or a combination of the two. That gives projects more flexibility in how a lock ends, though the price-based setup may be less straightforward for first-time users. It supports Ethereum, BNB Chain, Base and Arbitrum.

UNCX Network V3 focuses on locking liquidity positions until a chosen date, including V2, V3 and V4 positions where supported. It lists ten chains and also offers token vesting, staking and farming tools. Its broader range of products may suit projects managing more than liquidity locks, but availability varies by network and product. Both have an ease-of-use score of 7.5/10.

Neither platform publishes exact fee amounts. GoPlus does not publish a fee schedule for creating locks, and it says a small fee applies when liquidity stakers collect earnings during a lock. The amount is not stated. Network gas also applies when creating, extending or unlocking a GoPlus lock.

UNCX says service fees are separate from gas and vary by product and configuration. Its exact charges are not stated here, so check the relevant fee schedule before creating a lock. Gas is also required for approvals and the lock transaction on the chosen network. In short, neither can be called cheaper on the published figures. Compare the applicable product fees and network gas for your intended lock before confirming a transaction.

Both platforms rely on smart contracts, so a contract bug or flawed lock logic could put locked assets at risk. A public lock record can help others verify the position and its terms, but it does not prove that the contract is free of vulnerabilities or make the underlying token safe.

GoPlus Locker V3 has no audits listed. GoPlus Security's wider security focus is a point in its favour, but it is not a substitute for a published audit. UNCX lists two audits and links to reports, though their scope and dates are not summarized. Read those reports and check which contracts they cover before relying on them. With either platform, verify the contract address and remember that a lock only restricts the assets covered by that lock; it does not remove other token risks.

Choose GoPlus Locker V3 if a target-price unlock condition matters to your project, or if you want to lock tokens as well as liquidity on Ethereum, BNB Chain, Base or Arbitrum. Its roughly $30.4 million in locked value is higher than UNCX V3's roughly $26.8 million, but that alone does not establish which locker is safer or better suited to your needs. Check the contract and fee details before locking funds.

Choose UNCX Network V3 if you need a wider set of listed chains or want vesting, staking and farming tools alongside liquidity locking. Its two listed audits give you reports to examine, but audit counts do not guarantee safety. UNCX locks cannot be shortened or cancelled early, so choose the duration carefully. For either platform, confirm that your specific pool and product are supported on the network you plan to use.