Gamma vs Snuggle: fees, chains and vaults (2026)

Both protocols automate concentrated-liquidity positions, but Gamma is the broader platform. It lists dozens of chains and several product lines, including V2 Vaults, Pooled Vaults, a Limit Order Book and Perp Vaults. Its dashboard displays vault TVL, volume, fees and APR, and users can create a custom Uniswap V4 LP vault.

Snuggle is narrower in chain coverage, listing Robinhood Chain, Base and Arbitrum, with its described DEX and pool offering centered on Base and Arbitrum. Its distinguishing approach is zero-swap rebalancing: it repositions using tokens already held rather than swapping during the rebalance. It also offers strategy presets and range-width controls. Choose Gamma for breadth and vault options; choose Snuggle for its more focused, clearly described rebalancing setup.

Snuggle publishes a fee of 15% of earnings, meaning users keep 85% of what the position earns before other costs. It says it charges no fee per rebalance and that its rebalancing avoids swap fees and slippage. Network gas still applies to deposits, withdrawals and other actions, and exact gas costs are not published.

Gamma's management and performance fee levels are not published, so its net returns are harder to estimate in advance. Its vault table shows 24-hour fees and APR, but those figures do not establish the fees Gamma takes or the net return after costs. Incentive rewards can also change or end. Compare the specific vault's terms and likely costs before depositing; do not assume a displayed APR is what you will receive.

Both projects list two audits, but the public details are limited. Gamma does not name the audit firms or give dates or findings. Snuggle names Valves Security and says independent researchers and white-hat groups reviewed it, but audit dates, scope and findings are not published. Read the audit reports and confirm which contracts they cover before using either protocol.

Both place funds in smart-contract vaults that interact with DEXs. That means users face contract and DEX risks as well as market risk. Concentrated liquidity can suffer impermanent loss, and rebalancing does not prevent losses. Snuggle's no-swap approach can leave a position holding mostly one token for a long time if the price does not revert. Gamma's incentive-driven returns may change when rewards change or end. Deposit only what you can afford to lose.

Gamma is the stronger fit if you want to compare vaults across many networks, use a range of product types or build a custom Uniswap V4 LP vault. Its analytics can help you inspect TVL, volume, fees and APR, although those metrics do not remove strategy risk or resolve the unpublished fee schedule.

Snuggle fits users focused on Base or Arbitrum who value a simple stated fee, strategy presets, no stated minimum deposit and no lockups. Its backtests are historical simulations, not promised or realized returns, and the 15% fee reduces earnings. Its listed TVL is higher, but that alone does not show which vault will perform better or be safer. Check the pool, strategy settings, fee terms and risks on either platform before committing funds.