Comparison · Updated
Gamma vs Kodiak Islands: multi-chain reach or Berachain? (2026)
Choose Gamma for broad multi-chain access and vault analytics. Choose Kodiak Islands for tokenized LP positions and Berachain-native liquidity, while checking Island fees before depositing.

Gamma
Liquidity Manager
TVL $2.74M · 35 chains
Kodiak Islands
Liquidity Manager
TVL $15.3M · 1 chains
Side by side
Gamma vs Kodiak Islands at a glance
| Gamma | Kodiak Islands | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Liquidity manager for automated concentrated-liquidity positions | Automated vaults wrapping concentrated-liquidity positions |
| Chains | 35 listed chains | Berachain only |
| TVL | About $2.89 million | About $36.01 million |
| Token | GAMMA | KDK |
| Fees | Fee levels not published; network gas also applies | Managed Islands reportedly charge 10% of LP fees; check current Island fees and gas |
| Security and audits | Two audits listed; auditors, dates, and findings not published | Two audits listed; auditors, dates, and findings not published |
| Ease of use | Ease-of-use score: 7; vault analytics and chain filters | Ease-of-use score: 7; swaps and LP access in one app |
| Standout feature | Custom Uniswap V4 vault creation and broad chain coverage | LP positions represented as ERC-20 tokens |
| Strategy options | V2 Vaults, Pooled Vaults, Limit Order Book, and Perp Vaults | Managed and permissionless Islands |
| Best for | Users seeking automated LP management across many chains | Users seeking managed or fixed-range LP exposure on Berachain |
How Gamma and Kodiak Islands differ
Both products automate concentrated-liquidity management, helping users avoid manually adjusting price ranges. Their main difference is scope. Gamma is listed across 35 chains and offers several product lines, including V2 Vaults, Pooled Vaults, a Limit Order Book, and Perp Vaults. Its dashboard also shows vault TVL, volume, fees, and APR.
Kodiak Islands are limited to Berachain and integrate with the Kodiak DEX. They wrap LP positions into ERC-20 tokens, so a position can be held as one token. Users can choose managed Islands, which automate range management, or permissionless Islands with fixed ranges. The listed TVL is higher for Kodiak, but TVL alone does not determine returns or risk.
Fees and potential returns
Gamma does not publish its management or performance fee levels. Its vault table displays recent volume, fees, and APR, but those figures do not establish a user's net return. Network gas applies to deposits and withdrawals, and incentive rewards can change or end.
For Kodiak, managed Islands are reported to charge a 10% fee on LP fees earned. Permissionless Islands use fixed ranges, and the current fee for an Island is displayed in the Kodiak app before deposit. Users also face Berachain gas costs and the effects of the underlying pool's trading-fee tier. Check the specific Island's fee before committing funds. Neither product's displayed yield removes the possibility of losses, and incentive tokens may change in value.
Safety and risks
Both projects list two audits, but neither publishes auditor names, dates, or findings here. Treat the audit count as limited information, not a guarantee that contracts are free of bugs. Gamma is described as non-custodial, with funds held in smart contracts rather than by a company. Kodiak deposits also depend on on-chain vault contracts after funds are deposited.
Both products expose users to smart-contract and concentrated-liquidity risks, including impermanent loss. Kodiak adds reliance on Berachain and its ecosystem; Gamma's broad chain and DEX coverage means users also depend on the relevant networks and integrations for each vault. Incentive programs can change, and rewards can lose value. Review the applicable contract and strategy details and deposit only what you can afford to lose.
Which one should you choose?
Gamma suits users who want to compare vault metrics and choose among chains or strategy types. Its dashboard includes chain filters and vault data, and it offers custom Uniswap V4 LP vault creation. That breadth also means checking each vault's pool, strategy, fees, and incentive conditions before depositing.
Kodiak Islands suit users who specifically want Berachain LP exposure through the Kodiak DEX. The ERC-20 token format makes an Island position easier to hold as a single asset, and the app combines swaps with liquidity provision. Its interface is described as minimal, so check the app details carefully, especially for fees and whether an Island is managed or permissionless. Pick Gamma for range and chain choice; pick Kodiak for Berachain focus and tokenized positions.
Verdict: Gamma or Kodiak Islands?
Choose Gamma if you want automated LP management across many chains, a vault dashboard with TVL, volume, fees, and APR, or several strategy types. Its fee levels are not published, so estimate net returns carefully and check the vault before depositing. Choose Kodiak Islands if your focus is Berachain and you value LP positions represented as ERC-20 tokens, with managed or fixed-range options. Managed Islands are reported to charge 10% of LP fees; confirm the current fee in the app. Both list two audits, but neither publishes auditor details, and both carry smart-contract and liquidity risk.
Frequently asked questions
Which supports more chains?
Gamma lists 35 supported chains, while Kodiak Islands operate on Berachain only. Gamma is the fit for multi-chain access; Kodiak is focused on Berachain.
Which has clearer fees?
Gamma's fee levels are not published. Managed Kodiak Islands are reported to charge 10% of LP fees, but check the current Island fee in the app before depositing.
Which is safer?
Both list two audits, but neither publishes auditor names, dates, or findings in these details. Audits do not remove smart-contract or liquidity risks.
Which has higher TVL?
Gamma's listed TVL is about $2.89 million, compared with about $36.01 million for Kodiak Islands. TVL can change, and a larger figure does not guarantee better returns or safety.