Comparison · Updated
Gamma vs Kamino Liquidity: chains or Solana automation? (2026)
Gamma suits liquidity providers who want broad chain coverage and customizable vaults. Kamino Liquidity is the clearer fit for Solana users who want automated range selection, rebalancing and compounding.

Gamma
Liquidity Manager
TVL $2.73M · 35 chains
Kamino Liquidity
Liquidity Manager
TVL $65.5M · 1 chains
Side by side
Gamma vs Kamino Liquidity at a glance
| Gamma | Kamino Liquidity | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Liquidity manager | Liquidity manager |
| Chains | Dozens of listed networks, including Ethereum, BNB Chain, Polygon and Arbitrum | Solana only |
| TVL | About $2.89 million | About $66.90 million |
| Token | GAMMA | KMNO |
| Fees | Exact fee levels are not published | Exact fee levels are not published |
| Security and audits | Two audits listed; auditor names, dates and findings are not published | Two audits listed; auditor names, dates and findings are not published |
| Ease of use | 7/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Standout feature | Automated range management and custom Uniswap V4 LP vault creation | Automated range selection, rebalancing and fee-and-reward compounding |
| Other products | Several vault types, a limit order book and perp vaults | Liquidity vaults alongside credit and borrowing markets |
| Best for | Liquidity providers seeking automated management across many networks | Solana users seeking hands-off concentrated-liquidity management |
How Gamma and Kamino differ
Gamma and Kamino Liquidity both manage concentrated-liquidity positions, moving or maintaining liquidity around active price ranges instead of leaving all range decisions to the user. The main difference is their scope. Gamma spans dozens of listed networks and offers several vault and product types. Kamino is focused on Solana and emphasizes automated range selection, rebalancing and compounding.
That makes chain preference the first practical filter: Gamma is the more flexible option if you want to provide liquidity on networks such as Ethereum, Arbitrum or Base. Kamino fits users whose activity is on Solana and who want their trading fees and incentives reinvested automatically. The listed TVL figures also differ: Gamma has about $2.89 million, compared with about $66.90 million for Kamino. TVL indicates the amount deposited, but it does not guarantee returns or safety.
Automation and product features
Gamma’s vaults automatically rebalance concentrated-liquidity positions, and its homepage offers a way to create custom Uniswap V4 LP vaults. It also lists V2 vaults, pooled vaults, a limit order book and perp vaults. The vault dashboard displays TVL, volume, fees and APR, and eligible vaults can offer Merkl incentives. Incentive rewards may change or end, so an advertised APR should not be treated as fixed income.
Kamino chooses optimized price ranges using quantitative models, rebalances positions and compounds trading fees and incentive rewards back into them. Its liquidity products build on existing concentrated-liquidity protocols on Solana rather than operating their own pool. Kamino also offers credit and borrowing markets. In short, Gamma gives users a wider set of chains and listed product lines; Kamino describes a more integrated automation flow for Solana liquidity positions.
Chains and scale
Gamma’s listed network coverage is its clearest advantage for users who do not want to be limited to one blockchain. Its supported networks include major Ethereum layer 2s as well as other EVM networks. That breadth can make it easier to find a vault aligned with assets and pools across different ecosystems, though users still need to check each vault’s strategy and underlying DEX.
Kamino Liquidity runs on Solana only. That is a constraint for users whose assets are elsewhere, but it makes Kamino a straightforward choice for people who specifically want to manage liquidity in Solana markets. The listed TVL is substantially higher for Kamino than for Gamma, but size alone does not show whether a particular vault is suitable or what its future returns will be. Compare the individual pool, strategy and withdrawal terms before choosing either protocol.
Fees, yields and liquidity risks
Neither protocol publishes exact fee levels in this comparison. Gamma’s vault table shows recent vault-level fees and APR, but those figures do not establish the fee a user will pay or the net return after costs. Kamino says users can see vault yields and fees in its app before depositing. Both also involve network transaction fees, and the amount can vary by transaction and network.
Concentrated liquidity carries market risk on both platforms. A position can suffer impermanent loss, and moving prices can leave liquidity outside the active range. Automation can adjust a position, but it does not eliminate those risks or guarantee a positive return. Gamma’s eligible Merkl incentives can affect displayed yields and may change or end. Kamino compounds fees and rewards into positions, but compounding is not a promise of profit. Check the specific vault’s terms and expected costs before depositing.
Safety and which one to choose
Both protocols list two audits. Neither publishes the auditor names, dates or findings here, so the audit count alone is not enough to assess contract safety. Gamma is described as non-custodial, and Kamino users retain custody through their own wallets; in both cases, deposits are still exposed to smart-contract risk and to the underlying DEX protocols. Kamino also identifies oracle and strategy risk. Regulatory status is not stated for either.
Choose Gamma if multi-chain access, custom Uniswap V4 vault creation or a broader range of listed products matters most. Choose Kamino if you use Solana and value automated range selection, rebalancing and compounding, with credit and borrowing markets available in the wider protocol. Before depositing, review the exact vault, its fees, incentives and risk disclosures. Only commit funds you can afford to lose.
Verdict: Gamma or Kamino Liquidity?
Choose Gamma if you want automated concentrated-liquidity management across many networks, or want to create a custom Uniswap V4 LP vault. Its broader chain coverage and range of listed products make it the more flexible option, though exact fees are not published. Choose Kamino Liquidity if you are focused on Solana and want range selection, rebalancing and fee-and-reward compounding handled automatically. Kamino has the higher listed TVL, but that does not guarantee better returns or lower risk. Both list two audits and both carry impermanent-loss and smart-contract risks.
Frequently asked questions
Which has broader chain support?
Gamma lists support across dozens of chains, while Kamino Liquidity operates on Solana only. Choose based on where your assets and preferred DEXs are.
Which protocol has lower fees?
Exact fee levels are not published for either protocol. Check the relevant vault details in the app before depositing, and account for network transaction fees.
Are Gamma and Kamino audited?
Both list two audits, but neither publishes the auditors, dates or findings here. Audits do not remove smart-contract, underlying DEX or market risks.
Do either protocol’s vaults remove impermanent loss?
Both automate concentrated-liquidity positions, which can still lose value through impermanent loss. Kamino also compounds trading fees and incentive rewards into positions; Gamma offers Merkl incentives on eligible vaults.