Comparison · Updated
DeltaPrime vs Loop: broad leverage or ETH carry trades (2026)
DeltaPrime offers broader leveraged DeFi strategies and substantially more TVL; Loop focuses on ETH carry trades and supports more chains. Both carry leverage risk, and both list two audits without public details.

DeltaPrime
Leveraged Farming
TVL $3.21M · 2 chains
Side by side
DeltaPrime vs Loop at a glance
| DeltaPrime | Loop | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Leveraged farming | Lending market for ETH carry trades |
| Chains | Avalanche, Arbitrum | Ethereum, XDC, BNB Chain, Scroll |
| TVL | About $3.3 million | About $86,000 |
| Token | PRIME | No native token listed |
| Fees | Borrow rates, protocol fees and liquidation penalties not published | Borrow and supply rates, protocol fees and liquidation penalties not published |
| Security and audits | Two audits listed; auditors, scope and findings not public | Two audits listed; auditors, dates and findings not public |
| Ease of use | Not published | Not published |
| Standout feature | Borrowing to increase positions across trading, liquidity provision or farming | ETH borrowing against long-tail liquid restaking and Pendle LP collateral |
| Best for | Users seeking leverage across several DeFi strategy types | Experienced users focused on ETH carry trades |
| Key risk | Leverage can magnify losses and trigger liquidation | Leverage, liquidation and collateral depeg risks |
The core difference
Both protocols use borrowing to increase exposure, but they serve different purposes. DeltaPrime is the broader option: users can borrow to enlarge DeFi positions for trading, liquidity provision or farming. It groups strategies within Avalanche and Arbitrum, making it suited to users who want to use leverage across more than one type of activity. Loop is narrower by design. It is a lending market for Ethereum carry trades, where users post assets such as liquid restaking derivatives or Pendle LP tokens as collateral to borrow ETH. That specificity may suit an experienced user who already understands the collateral and strategy. It is not a general substitute for DeltaPrime’s wider set of leveraged strategies.
Chains, strategies and liquidity
Loop lists four chains: Ethereum, XDC, BNB Chain and Scroll. DeltaPrime lists two: Avalanche and Arbitrum. More listed chains do not mean that every strategy or collateral market is available on each one, so check the app before committing funds. The clearest difference is the strategy itself: DeltaPrime describes multiple uses for borrowed capital, while Loop is built around ETH carry trades and borrowing against long-tail collateral. DeltaPrime also has substantially more TVL, at about $3.3 million compared with Loop’s roughly $86,000. That makes DeltaPrime the larger protocol by this measure, but its TVL is still small and does not guarantee that a particular market has sufficient liquidity. Loop’s lower TVL makes liquidity depth an especially important consideration.
Fees and leverage risk
Neither project publishes a complete fee schedule. DeltaPrime’s borrow interest rates, protocol fees and liquidation penalties are not published; Loop’s borrow and supply rates, protocol fees and liquidation penalties are also not published. Network gas costs apply when using either protocol, and borrowing costs can affect the result of a leveraged position. Check the current rates and terms in the app before opening a position, and consider how costs could change over time. Leverage can magnify losses as well as gains, and positions can be liquidated. Loop’s use of long-tail collateral adds risks tied to the underlying assets and protocols, including depeg risk. Do not treat a strategy’s potential yield or points exposure as a guaranteed return.
Safety and choosing between them
Both protocols list two audits, but neither publishes the auditor details, scope and findings needed to assess what those audits covered. An audit does not eliminate smart-contract risk. DeltaPrime’s listed TVL is larger, but it still has limited scale; Loop’s TVL is particularly small. Neither figure proves that funds can be withdrawn quickly in every market condition. Choose DeltaPrime if you want a broader set of leveraged DeFi strategies and its Avalanche or Arbitrum deployments suit you. Choose Loop only if your goal is specifically an ETH carry trade and you understand its collateral, liquidation and depeg risks. If you cannot assess those risks or tolerate a loss, neither leveraged protocol is a suitable fit.
Verdict: DeltaPrime or Loop?
Choose DeltaPrime if you want to use leverage across trading, liquidity provision or farming on Avalanche or Arbitrum. Its roughly $3.3 million TVL is far larger than Loop’s, though it remains small and does not make the protocol safe. Choose Loop only if you specifically want an ETH carry-trade market and understand the risks of borrowing against long-tail collateral. Its four listed chains do not offset its very small TVL or the added collateral risks. Both list two audits without public scope or findings, and neither publishes complete fees. If leverage risk is unacceptable, choose neither.
Frequently asked questions
Which protocol has more TVL?
DeltaPrime has about $3.3 million in TVL, compared with about $86,000 for Loop. These figures indicate that DeltaPrime is the larger of the two, but TVL alone does not establish safety or guarantee liquidity.
Do DeltaPrime and Loop support the same chains?
No. DeltaPrime supports Avalanche and Arbitrum, while Loop lists Ethereum, XDC, BNB Chain and Scroll. Check the selected chain and market before depositing.
Are their fees published?
Neither publishes a complete fee schedule. DeltaPrime's borrow rates, protocol fees and liquidation penalties are not published; Loop's borrow and supply rates, protocol fees and liquidation penalties are also not published.
Which protocol is safer?
Neither can be called safer based on the audit count alone: both list two audits, but auditor, scope and findings are not public. DeltaPrime adds leveraged strategy and liquidation risk; Loop also relies on long-tail collateral that can carry depeg and underlying-protocol risks.