Skip to content

DappsAtlas index · 14,224 dApps

DappsAtlas

Comparison · Updated

Backpack vs Bitget: Which exchange fits you? (2026)

Backpack suits users who want crypto, US stocks and a self-custody wallet in one app. Bitget offers a broader trading suite and a larger listed TVL, but both are custodial exchanges with unpublished trading fees and high-risk leveraged products.

Illustration for Backpack vs Bitget: Which exchange fits you? (2026)
Backpack logo

Backpack

Centralized Exchanges

Score 7.6 out of 10

TVL $505M · 29 chains

Bitget logo

Bitget

Centralized Exchanges

Score 7.6 out of 10

TVL $5.82B · 71 chains

Side by side

Backpack vs Bitget at a glance

Backpack and Bitget compared
 BackpackBitget
CategoryCentralized exchange with a separate self-custody walletCentralized exchange with a separate Web3 wallet
ChainsListed support includes Solana, Bitcoin, Ethereum, Arbitrum and 20+ chains for its walletListed support spans many chains, including Bitcoin, Solana, Ethereum, Tron and Polygon
Listed TVL$533.2 million$6.16 billion
TokenBPBGB
FeesStock trading is advertised as zero commission, but spreads may apply; crypto spot and perps fees are not publishedTrading fees are not published; check Bitget’s fee schedule
Security and auditsNo audit listed; exchange is custodial; links a Proof of Reserves page whose contents are not publicNo audit listed; exchange is custodial; claims monthly 1:1 proof of reserves and a $300M+ protection fund
Ease of useEase-of-use score: 8/10Ease-of-use score: 7.5/10
Standout featureCross-collateral margin across crypto, cash and stocks, plus yield on balancesBroad product range, including copy trading, bots, Earn, P2P and GetAgent
Best forCrypto traders who also want US stocks, cross-collateral margin and a self-custody walletTraders looking for a wider set of trading tools and multi-asset products
LeveragePerpetual futures offer up to 75x leverageFutures and stock perps list leverage options up to 100x

How Backpack and Bitget differ

Both are centralized exchanges, but they package their products differently. Backpack focuses on bringing crypto, US stocks and ETFs, perpetual futures and a separate self-custody wallet into one app. Its main distinction is cross-collateral margin: cash, crypto and stocks can count as collateral, and balances or unrealized PnL may earn variable yield through lending on the platform. Bitget has a wider trading catalogue. It lists spot, futures, margin, CFDs, copy trading, bots, Earn and P2P, as well as tokenized stock exposure and stock perpetuals. It also advertises an AI assistant and desktop clients. The listed TVL is higher for Bitget, at about $6.16 billion versus Backpack’s $533.2 million, but that figure alone does not establish safety or suitability. Choose based on the products you will actually use, not breadth alone.

Fees and costs

Neither comparison provides enough information to establish which has cheaper crypto trading. Backpack’s crypto spot and perpetual-futures fee schedules are not published. It does advertise zero commission on stock and ETF trades, but quoted stock prices may include a spread. Withdrawing tokenized stocks to Solana costs a fee, and network fees also apply. Backpack says its VIP program offers lower fees, but does not publish the tiers here. Bitget’s trading fees are also not stated; its fee schedule is where spot, futures and withdrawal charges should be checked. Derivatives can have additional costs, including funding rates, and fees may vary by account tier. Before choosing either exchange, compare the current charges for the specific market and transaction you plan to use. Do not treat a zero-commission stock offer as meaning that every transaction is cost-free.

Safety and custody

Both platforms are custodial exchanges, so users depend on each company to hold and process exchange-side funds. Neither has an audit listed. Backpack links to a Proof of Reserves page, but its contents are not public in the material reviewed. It also says balances are not bank deposits and are not covered by a government deposit insurance program. Bitget says it has a $300M+ protection fund and publishes monthly 1:1 proof of reserves verified through a Merkle tree. These are the exchange’s stated claims; public sources do not independently confirm them or name the relevant regulators. Backpack’s separate wallet is described as self-custodial, meaning users hold the keys themselves, but that does not change the custodial nature of its exchange. Both offer leveraged products that can lead to rapid losses. Check local availability and terms, and avoid keeping more on an exchange than you need.

Products and trading features

Backpack’s clearest advantage is combining exchange features with US stock and ETF trading and a self-custody wallet that supports more than 20 chains and hardware wallets. It also offers tokenized stocks that can be withdrawn to Solana for a fee. Its perps support crypto and equities, with leverage up to 75x, and its cross-collateral design may appeal to users who want to use several asset types as margin. Bitget’s catalogue is broader: it lists spot and futures trading, stock perps, tokenized stock exposure, copy trading, bots, APIs, Earn products, P2P crypto buying and a Web3 wallet. It advertises leverage options up to 100x for futures and stock perps. That range may suit experienced users who know which tools they need, but can be confusing for beginners. In both cases, availability varies by region and product.

Which should you choose?

Choose Backpack if you specifically want US stocks and ETFs alongside crypto, value its separate self-custody wallet, or expect to use cross-collateral margin. Its stock commission claim is a useful distinction, but spreads, tokenized-stock withdrawal charges and unpublished crypto trading fees still matter. Choose Bitget if you want a wider selection of exchange tools, such as copy trading, bots, P2P, Earn and APIs, and are comfortable checking the current costs and regional restrictions yourself. Neither is an obvious choice for someone seeking a non-custodial exchange account: both exchange sides hold user funds. Beginners should be cautious with either platform’s derivatives, especially at high leverage. Check product eligibility and local rules before opening an account, and do not treat either platform’s reserve or protection claims as a guarantee against loss.

Verdict: Backpack or Bitget?

Choose Backpack if you want a focused mix of crypto, US stocks and ETFs, plus a separate self-custody wallet and cross-collateral margin. Its stock commission offer may appeal to stock traders, but spreads and unpublished crypto trading fees need checking. Choose Bitget if you value a wider range of exchange products, including copy trading, bots, P2P and Earn, and are prepared to navigate a more complex platform. Neither is a low-risk place to use leverage: both are custodial, and their most aggressive derivatives can lead to substantial losses. Check fees, regional eligibility and local rules before deciding.

Frequently asked questions

Which exchange has lower fees?

Backpack advertises zero commission on stocks and ETFs, though quoted prices may include a spread. Bitget’s fee levels are not published, so compare its current fee schedule before trading.

Which platform is safer?

Both exchange platforms are custodial, and neither has an audit listed. Backpack links to a Proof of Reserves page whose contents are not public; Bitget says it publishes monthly 1:1 proof of reserves and has a protection fund, but those claims are not independently confirmed here.

How do Backpack and Bitget differ in features?

Backpack combines crypto trading, US stocks and ETFs, perps, cross-collateral margin and a separate self-custody wallet. Bitget adds products such as copy trading, bots, Earn, P2P and a Web3 wallet, alongside tokenized stock exposure and stock perps.

Which has higher leverage?

Both offer leveraged derivatives, which can cause rapid losses or liquidation. Backpack advertises up to 75x leverage, while Bitget lists options up to 100x; these products are high risk and may not suit beginners.