Angle vs Resupply: Which stablecoin protocol fits? (2026)

Angle and Resupply both sit in the CDP category, but they serve different stablecoin strategies. Angle centers on agEUR, a euro stablecoin that users can mint against supported tokens. Its Core module also offers perpetual positions and yield deposits, while its Borrowing module lets users borrow agEUR or gain leverage against collateral. The protocol is deployed on eight chains.

Resupply is narrower: users deposit crvUSD or frxUSD into Curve Lend or Fraxlend markets, use those positions as collateral, and borrow reUSD. The underlying lending positions continue to earn yield. Resupply operates on Ethereum only. Its Insurance Pool is designed to fund liquidations and act as a reserve if approved collateral fails.

Choose based on the asset and strategy you want, not just the shared CDP label. Angle suits a broader euro-oriented, multi-chain setup; Resupply suits users who specifically want reUSD borrowing tied to those lending markets.

Angle publishes only partial fee information. Its app footer shows 0% withdrawal fees, but fees for minting agEUR, borrowing, perpetual trading and swaps are not stated publicly. Users also pay network gas on the chain they use. Check the app and documentation for the applicable costs before confirming a transaction.

Resupply does not publish a flat fee. Its borrow rate is variable and equals the highest of half the market lending rate, half the sfrxUSD rate or 2%, so the stated minimum borrow rate is 2%. That formula makes the minimum clear, but the rate can change with market conditions. Ethereum gas also adds to transaction costs. Resupply says the Insurance Pool earns a fee when used for liquidations, while pool depositors receive a share of protocol revenue.

Neither protocol offers enough published information to claim that it is always cheaper. Compare the current in-app borrowing or transaction costs for your intended position, and account for gas as well as any rate that may change over time.

Both protocols list two audits, but an audit is not a guarantee against loss. Angle does not name its auditors or publish their findings. Its risks include smart-contract bugs, collateral and liquidation mechanics, oracle design, and the additional contracts and bridges involved in a multi-chain deployment. Its TVL is about $1.63 million, and thinner liquidity can matter during market stress. A stablecoin may also lose its peg.

Resupply describes its contracts as immutable and non-custodial, but it depends on Curve Lend and Fraxlend markets; failures in those markets can affect reUSD. More importantly, a June 2025 report says an exploit drained nearly $9.6 million. Resupply has not published how losses were handled or what changed afterward. Read the project's post-mortem and current documentation before considering a position.

For either protocol, borrowing and leverage add liquidation risk. Resupply's advertised leverage can magnify mistakes, while Angle's borrowing and perpetual features carry their own contract and market risks. Only commit funds you can afford to lose.

Angle has the broader feature set for users who want euro-denominated DeFi: agEUR minting, collateralized borrowing, perpetuals and yield deposits in one protocol, across eight chains. Its ease-of-use score is 7/10, compared with Resupply's 6.5/10. These scores are a modest difference, not a substitute for checking whether the app supports the position and chain you want.

Resupply has a more specialized workflow centered on crvUSD or frxUSD lending positions and reUSD borrowing. Its feature score is 7/10, matching Angle's, but its protocol is Ethereum-only. It may suit users already using the relevant Curve Lend or Fraxlend markets and who understand how collateral and borrowing rates work.

Neither choice is a general-purpose answer for every stablecoin user. Angle's multiple modules and chains offer more ways to use the protocol, but also mean more components to evaluate. Resupply's focused design is easier to describe, yet the reported exploit and reliance on external lending markets deserve close attention.

Pick Angle if you want agEUR, need access across several networks, or value having minting, borrowing, perpetuals and yield deposits in one protocol. Its listed TVL is much smaller than Resupply's, so consider liquidity as well as the multi-chain smart-contract risks. The fees for several core actions are not published, so check the transaction details rather than assuming a cost.

Pick Resupply if your specific goal is borrowing reUSD against crvUSD or frxUSD lending positions while retaining their underlying yield. Its listed TVL is about $50.21 million, but a higher TVL does not remove the risks from its reported June 2025 exploit, its collateral-market dependencies or variable borrow costs. Do not treat the Insurance Pool as a guarantee against losses.

If security history is your main deciding factor, neither is risk-free, and Resupply's reported exploit makes extra due diligence essential. For euro-focused, multi-chain use, Angle is the clearer fit; for the narrower reUSD strategy, Resupply is the more direct match.