Skip to content

DappsAtlas index · 14,224 dApps

DappsAtlas

Comparison · Updated

Angle vs crvUSD: Euro DeFi or Curve’s dollar stablecoin (2026)

Angle suits users seeking euro-denominated DeFi across several chains. crvUSD is the stronger fit for users who want Curve’s dollar-pegged stablecoin and soft-liquidation design on Ethereum.

Illustration for Angle vs crvUSD: Euro DeFi or Curve’s dollar stablecoin (2026)
Angle logo

Angle

CDPs

Score 6.7 out of 10

TVL $1.61M · 8 chains

crvUSD logo

crvUSD

CDPs

Score 7.4 out of 10

TVL $112M · 1 chains

Side by side

Angle vs crvUSD at a glance

Angle and crvUSD compared
 AnglecrvUSD
CategoryCDP and stablecoin protocolCDP and stablecoin protocol
StablecoinagEUR, an over-collateralized euro stablecoincrvUSD, an over-collateralized dollar-pegged stablecoin
ChainsEthereum, Arbitrum, Polygon, Optimism, Avalanche, BNB Chain, Celo and GnosisEthereum
TVLAbout $1.63 millionAbout $126.65 million
Token and governanceANGLE; veANGLE holders govern the protocolCRV; DAO governance
Fees0% withdrawal fees shown; other protocol fees are not publishedFee schedule not published; Ethereum gas applies
Security and auditsTwo audits listed; auditors and findings not publishedTwo audits listed; auditors and findings not published
Ease-of-use score7/106.5/10
Standout featuresMinting, borrowing, perpetuals and yield depositsMint and Lend markets, savings product and LLAMMA liquidation design
Best forUsers seeking euro-denominated DeFi across multiple chainsUsers seeking Curve’s dollar-pegged stablecoin on Ethereum

How Angle and crvUSD differ

Both protocols let users mint an over-collateralized stablecoin against crypto assets, but the stablecoins serve different needs. Angle’s agEUR is euro-denominated; crvUSD is designed to stay near $1. Choose based first on which currency exposure you want. Angle also combines minting with collateralized borrowing, perpetual positions and yield deposits in its Core and Borrowing modules. crvUSD centers on Curve’s Mint and Lend markets, its savings product scrvUSD and its LLAMMA liquidation design. Angle is deployed on eight chains, while crvUSD is listed on Ethereum only. That gives Angle broader chain availability, but it also means assessing the contracts and risks across several networks. crvUSD’s narrower deployment may suit someone already using Ethereum and Curve.

Fees and costs

Neither protocol publishes a full fee schedule. Angle’s app footer shows 0% withdrawal fees, but it does not state fees for minting agEUR, borrowing, perpetual trading or swaps. The app and documentation show protocol fees, borrow rates and yield rates before confirmation, so check the specific transaction rather than assuming it is free. crvUSD also has no published fee schedule. Borrow rates, minting charges and savings yield are not stated and vary by market; users should check current market details before opening a position. Network gas is separate from protocol charges. Angle users pay gas on whichever supported chain they use, and crvUSD transactions incur Ethereum gas. Gas costs vary, so compare the current network cost and market terms before committing funds.

Safety and risks

Both projects have two audits listed, but neither publishes the auditors or audit findings. That does not make either protocol risk-free. Angle’s risks include its smart contracts, collateral and liquidation mechanics, oracle design and the additional contracts and bridges involved in its multi-chain footprint. Its TVL is about $1.63 million, so liquidity may be thinner, particularly in stressed conditions. crvUSD also carries smart-contract and collateral risks. Its LLAMMA design is intended to soften liquidations, but positions can still be lost if collateral prices fall far enough. Its peg relies on Peg Stability Reserves and Curve pool liquidity rather than a fiat-backed reserve. Both can face peg risk, and governance decisions can affect collateral or protocol rules. Only commit funds you can afford to lose.

Which should you choose?

Choose Angle if you specifically want a euro stablecoin, need access across its listed chains, or value having minting, borrowing, perpetuals and yield deposits in one protocol. Its listed TVL is much smaller than crvUSD’s, so consider liquidity as well as features. Choose crvUSD if a dollar-pegged asset and Curve’s markets, savings option and LLAMMA design fit your plans, and you are comfortable using Ethereum. Its TVL is about $126.65 million, but that does not remove liquidation, peg or contract risk. For either protocol, check the live collateral terms, rates, transaction costs and market liquidity before taking a position. Neither is the automatic choice for every user: the currency, chain and product features should decide.

Verdict: Angle or crvUSD?

Pick Angle if you want agEUR, a euro-denominated stablecoin, or need its multi-chain reach and mix of minting, borrowing, perpetuals and yield deposits. Pick crvUSD if you want a dollar-pegged stablecoin within Curve’s Ethereum markets and value its LLAMMA liquidation design and scrvUSD savings option. crvUSD has substantially higher TVL, while Angle supports more chains. Both have two audits listed, but neither publishes audit details or a complete fee schedule. Weigh the currency and chain you need against liquidity, costs and the risks of collateral-backed positions.

Frequently asked questions

What is the main difference between Angle and crvUSD?

Angle’s agEUR is euro-denominated, while crvUSD is designed to stay near $1. Both are over-collateralized stablecoins, but they have different collateral, market and peg mechanisms.

Which protocol supports more chains?

Angle is listed on Ethereum, Arbitrum, Polygon, Optimism, Avalanche, BNB Chain, Celo and Gnosis. crvUSD is listed on Ethereum only.

Are Angle and crvUSD fees published?

Angle lists 0% withdrawal fees, but fees for minting, borrowing, perpetuals and swaps are not published. crvUSD has no published fee schedule; users should check the current market details and account for network gas.

Have Angle and crvUSD been audited?

Both have two audits listed, but neither project details the auditors or findings. Audits do not eliminate smart-contract, collateral, liquidation or peg risks.